New Evidence of Homophobes’ Secret Attraction for Menby Carla Clark, PhD | July 8, 2016
Previous research indicates that some homophobic men’s views can be explained as an unconscious or forced self-denial about being attracted to the same sex, although results have been inconsistent. New research just published in The Journal of Sexual Medicine overcomes problems with previous research and adds to the evidence that many homophobic men have homosexual desires, whether they know it or not!
Until now, the strongest support for homophobic men being attracted to men was a study where 54% of the homophobic men that were tested, but not non-homophobic men, became physiologically aroused (i.e., had increase in penile tumescence) while watching explicit erotic homosexual videotapes.
However, penile tumescence is not a perfect measure of male sexual interest and may signal anxiety.
Moreover, another homophobia study suggested this to be the case, where defensive homophobic men have a phobic-like aversion to homosexual stimuli. However, the tests they used were not designed in a way that could truly reveal an suppressed sexual attraction towards other men, and certainly wouldn’t see through a secretly gay homophobe’s self-denial.
Thus the present study turned away from penile tumescence tests and instead used well-used measures of sexual interest that does not rely on genital sexual arousal, or on conscious input that could help hide homosexual attraction.
Using eye-tracking technology, men with low and high levels of homophobia had their viewing time of homosexual vs heterosexual photographs compared with their ratings of such images. In addition, a manikin task was used to assess impulsive, unconscious tendencies towards homosexual images.
The manikin task provided an indirect measure of impulsive approach and avoidance behaviors towards homosexual and heterosexual images. During the task participants were asked to move a computerized manikin towards a homosexual image and away from a heterosexual image on the screen, and vice versa. Button pressing reaction times were used to identify a natural impulse toward homosexual images, signifying attraction, or a natural impulse to avoid homosexual images.
As with other studies, men low in homophobia were pretty straightforward: they viewed homosexual images less than heterosexual ones, rated heterosexual images as the most attractive and had low impulsive approach tendencies toward homosexual stimuli.
Men with high levels of homophobia on the other hand, were a mixed bag.
The major finding of this study was that:
Men high in homophobia looked significantly longer at homosexual than at heterosexual photographs, but only when they had a high impulsive tendency toward homosexual stimuli. This result adds to the evidence that some men high in homophobia may indeed have a suppressed or masked sexual interest toward homosexual stimuli, whereas others do not.
In other words, some homophobic men don’t have an impulsive attraction for other men. In the present study, the more homophobic the personal views were for these ‘true’ homophobes, the less time they spent viewing homophobic images in the experiment. However, some homophobic men do have an impulsive attraction for other men. For these ‘pseudo’ homophobe participants, the more homophobic their views were, the more time they spent viewing homophobic images.
Other research has confirmed that some homophobic men get more angry and anxious after viewing homosexual images like those presented in the study in question. Ironically, such stress makes controlling and overriding any latent impulses that could give away one’s hidden sexual orientation more difficult.
The next step forward in research is to start studies with larger numbers of men that combines both genital and non-genital measures of sexual interest, as well as stress responses. It may be that some ‘pseudo’ homophobes were not identified in the present study, simply because they are effective in managing stress and masking their innate attraction towards men.
Nonetheless, the present evidence implies that for some, homophobia may in reality be an external manifestation of repressed same-sex sexual desires.
Adams, H., Wright, L., & Lohr, B. (1996). Is homophobia associated with homosexual arousal? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105 (3), 440-445 DOI: 10.1037/0021-843x.105.3.440
Barlow, D., Sakheim, D., & Beck, J. (1983). Anxiety increases sexual arousal. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92 (1), 49-54 DOI: 10.1037/0021-843x.92.1.49
Cheval, B., Radel, R., Grob, E., Ghisletta, P., Bianchi-Demicheli, F., & Chanal, J. (2016). Homophobia: An Impulsive Attraction to the Same Sex? Evidence From Eye-Tracking Data in a Picture-Viewing Task The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 13 (5), 825-834 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.02.165
Friese, M., & Hofmann, W. (2012). Just a Little Bit Longer: Viewing Time of Erotic Material from a Self-Control Perspective Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26 (3), 489-496 DOI: 10.1002/acp.2831
Laws, D., & Gress, C. (2004). Seeing things differently: The viewing time alternative to penile plethysmography Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9 (2), 183-196 DOI: 10.1348/1355325041719338
Meier, B., Robinson, M., Gaither, G., & Heinert, N. (2006). A secret attraction or defensive loathing? Homophobia, defense, and implicit cognition Journal of Research in Personality, 40 (4), 377-394 DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.01.007
Weinstein, N., Ryan, W., DeHaan, C., Przybylski, A., Legate, N., & Ryan, R. (2012). Parental autonomy support and discrepancies between implicit and explicit sexual identities: Dynamics of self-acceptance and defense. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102 (4), 815-832 DOI: 10.1037/a0026854
No future articles scheduled.
This Sunday February 14th (9 p.m. ET), the Emmy-nominated Brain Games tv-show is back! Wonder junkie Jason Silva returns to our screens, teaming up with... READ MORE →
Like what you read? Give to Brain Blogger sponsored by GNIF with a tax-deductible donation.Make A Donation